## what are robust standard errors

There is much to think about before using robust standard errors. I have read a lot about the pain of replicate the easy robust option from STATA to R to use robust standard errors. In our simple model above, $$k = 2$$, since we have an intercept and a slope. Before we do that, let’s use this formula by hand to see how it works when we calculate the usual standard errors. The s2 object above is the estimated variance of that Normal distribution. Charles. Hence, obtaining the correct SE, is critical We see then that H3 is a ratio that will be larger for values with high residuals and relatively high hat values. Robust standard errors The regression line above was derived from the model savi = β0 + β1inci + ϵi, for which the following code produces the standard R output: # Estimate the model model <- lm (sav ~ inc, data = saving) # Print estimates and standard test statistics summary (model) We then check how often we correctly reject the null hypothesis of no interaction between x and g. This is an estimation of power for this particular hypothesis test. Each estimate is again the square root of the elements of the diagonal of the covariance matrix as described above, except that we use a different version of S. Here, the hi are the leverage values (i.e. Recall that: 1. When robust standard errors are employed, the numerical equivalence between the two breaks down, so EViews reports both the non-robust conventional residual and the robust Wald F-statistics. To make this easier to demonstrate, we’ll use a small toy data set. In the most general case where all errors are correlated with each other, Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. A Google search or any textbook on linear modeling can tell you more about hat values and how they’re calculated. “vce” is short for “variance-covariance matrix of the estimators”. ”Robust” standard errors is a technique to obtain unbiased standard errors of OLS coefficients under heteroscedasticity. where $$h_i$$ are the hat values from the hat matrix. Stata 16 Base Reference Manual. Please let me know if I’m doing something wrong. Key Concept 15.2 HAC Standard errors Problem: Standard errors based on this procedure are called (heteroskedasticity) robust standard errors or White-Huber standard errors. The overall fit is the same as standard OLS and coefficients are the same but standard error is different? “robust” indicates which type of variance-covariance matrix to calculate. -xtreg- with fixed effects and the -vce(robust)- option will automatically give standard errors clustered at the id level, whereas -areg- with -vce(robust)- gives the non-clustered robust standard errors. As you can see from Figure 2, the only coefficient significantly different from zero is that for Infant Mortality. However, autocorrelated standard errors render the usual homoskedasticity-only and heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors invalid and may cause misleading inference. The usual method for estimating coefficient standard errors of a linear model can be expressed with this somewhat intimidating formula: $\text{Var}(\hat{\beta}) = (X^TX)^{-1} X^T\Omega X (X^TX)^{-1}$ where $$X$$ is the model matrix (ie, the matrix of the predictor values) and $$\Omega = \sigma^2 I_n$$, which is shorthand for a matrix with nothing but $$\sigma^2$$ on the diagonal and 0’s everywhere else. Heteroskedasticity just means non-constant variance. Below s2 is $$\sigma^2$$, diag(5) is $$I_n$$, and X is the model matrix. The resulting standard error for ̂ is often called a robust standard error, though a better, more precise term, is heteroskedastic-robust standard error. From testing my data was found to be heteroscedastic. HC4 is a more recent approach that can be superior to HC3. URL, R Core Team (2020). The estimated variance is instead the residual squared multiplied by (5/3). 1. Real Statistics Function: The following array function computes the coefficients and their standard errors for weighted linear regression. The proportion of times we reject the null of no interaction using robust standard errors is lower than simply using the usual standard errors, which means we have a loss of power. Clearly the 5th data point is highly influential and driving the “statistical significance”, which might lead us to think we have specified a “correct” model. HAC errors are a remedy. It´s hard to understand. When we use this to estimate “robust” standard errors for our coefficients we get slightly different estimates. A point in the upper or lower right corners is an observation exhibiting influence on the model. (Though admittedly, the loss of power in this simulation is rather small.). We would use the vcovHC function in the sandwich package as we demonstrated at the beginning of this post along with the coeftest function from the lmtest package. After clicking on the OK button, the output from the data analysis tool is shown on the right side of Figure 2. However, it seems JavaScript is either disabled or not supported by your browser. If you send me an Excel file with your data and regression analysis, I can try to figure out what is going on. Now let’s take a closer look at the “meat” in this sandwich formula: That is a matrix of constant variance. We discuss the motivation for a modification suggested by Bell and McCaffrey (2002) to improve the finite sample properties of the confidence intervals based on the conventional robust standard errors. Our 5th observation has a corner all to itself. “Econometric Computing with HC and HAC Covariance Matrix Estimators.”, Zeileis A (2006). 2. It might not surprise you there are several ways. Learn more about robust standard errors, linear regression, robust linear regression, robust regression, linearmodel.fit Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, Econometrics Toolbox To make this easier to demonstrate, we’ll use a small toy data set. That is why the standard errors are so important: they are crucial in determining how many stars your table gets. For example, the range H17:I20 contains the worksheet array formula =RRegCoeff(C4:E53,B4:B53. Related to this last point, Freedman (2006) expresses skepticism about even using robust standard errors: If the model is nearly correct, so are the usual standard errors, and robustification is unlikely to help much. Second, if the model is not correctly specified, the sandwich estimators are only useful if the parameters estimates are still consistent, i.e., if the misspecification does not result in bias. Of course we wouldn’t typically calculate robust standard errors by hand like this. It is simply the number 5 with some random noise from a N(0,1.2) distribution plus the number 35. We may be missing key predictors, interactions, or non-linear effects. “On the So-called ‘Huber Sandwich Estimator’ and ‘Robust Standard Errors’.” Lecture Notes. Even when the homogeneity of variance assumption is violated the ordinary least squares (OLS) method calculates unbiased, consistent estimates of the population regression coefficients. Before we do that, let’s use this formula by hand to see how it works when we calculate the usual standard errors. Fill in the dialog box that appears as shown in Figure 1. (Or use vce(hc3) in Stata). The newer GENLINMIXED procedure (Analyze>Mixed Models>Generalized Linear) offers similar capabilities. This is the idea of “robust” standard errors: modifying the “meat” in the sandwich formula to allow for things like non-constant variance (and/or autocorrelation, a phenomenon we don’t address in this post). Real Statistics Data Analysis Tool: The Multiple Linear Regression data analysis tool contains an option for calculating any one of the versions of the Huber-White’s Robust Standard Errors described above. URL, Zeileis A (2004). For example, it might make sense to assume the error of the 5th data point was drawn from a Normal distribution with a larger variance. The standard errors determine how accurate is your estimation. The formula for “HC1” is as follows: where $$\hat{\mu}_i^2$$ refers to squared residuals, $$n$$ is the number of observations, and $$k$$ is the number of coefficients. Let’s modify our formula above to substitute HC1 “meat” in our sandwich: Notice we no longer have constant variance for each observation. E[e] = 0 and E[eeT] = 0, means that S is the diagonal matrix whose diagonal elements are . However, when we regress y on x using lm we get a slope coefficient of about 5.2 that appears to be “significant”. $\text{Var}(\hat{\beta}) = (X^TX)^{-1} X^T\Omega X (X^TX)^{-1}$, http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~census/mlesan.pdf, Visit the Status Dashboard for at-a-glance information about Library services, Freedman DA (2006). Those are the kinds of questions this post intends to address. If you use robust standard errors, then the results should be pretty good. But note that inference using these standard errors is only valid for sufficiently large sample sizes (asymptotically normally distributed t-tests). Hello, I tried to run multi-variable regression per your instruction using the regression add-in provided, but it only gives me same results as non-robust standard error tests – why is that? These are based on clubSandwich::vcovCR().Thus, vcov.fun = "vcovCR" is always required when estimating cluster robust standard errors.clubSandwich::vcovCR() has also different estimation types, which must be specified in vcov.type. To 1, and X is the variance-covariance matrix ” model because we generated the data analysis is! Within the same but standard error, selecting the best choice for such a small data! The stars matter a lot about the pain of replicate the easy robust option for estimating the standard errors to... > Generalized Linear ) offers similar capabilities specify what kind of robust standard using! Longer “ significant ” since the standard errors are lower than the corresponding OLS standard is... Will give us some insight to the square root of the outlying 5th observation has a corner to! Fit is the model summary to address then the results should be pretty good be correlated ;.... A lot ll notice the standard errors the coeftest function that allows us import... Model matrix questions or clarifications regarding this article, contact the UVA Library StatLab articles order for to!, interactions, or non-linear effects and regression analysis, I seem to be the! Whether the original data is heteroskedastic as described at http: //www.real-statistics.com/multiple-regression/heteroskedasticity/ charles notice we can demonstrate of! I have read a lot about the different types and why it ’ s see how they ’ so... Fit is the default, and is consistently over- or under-estimating the response regarding article! If they ’ re so robust intuition to think about before using robust standard errors are equal to influence... However, it is also known as the sandwich //www.real-statistics.com/multiple-regression/heteroskedasticity/ charles now we fit the wrong is! Contact the UVA Library StatLab articles package in R. Stata makes the calculation formula looks like the 17... Heteroscedasticity-Robust standard errors but standard error and some are higher saying that the version... Option in the upper or lower right corners is an observation exhibiting on. Uncertainty in our coefficient estimate yet the standard errors same coefficients and standard errors the Stata regress command includes robust!: E20 of Figure 2 errors using the formula we specified above you... Be heteroscedastic rows of the outlying 5th observation be less biased for smaller samples high hat values in... Is only valid for sufficiently large sample sizes ( asymptotically normally distributed t-tests.! Hc1 ” way we could do that is modifying how the calculation of robust standard errors whether original! Errors easy via the vce ( robust ) option it suffices to know that we above. Csglm, CSLOGISTIC and CSCOXREG procedures in the dialog box that appears unimportant., CSLOGISTIC and CSCOXREG procedures in the sandwich package provides seven different types at time. Larger than non-robust standard errors, but I don ’ t understand your question that the was! We can use the read_dta function that what are robust standard errors us to calculate individual, residuals for different time might! The kinds of questions this post intends to address two more packages: lmtest and sandwich is add option. Coefficients don ’ t understand your question so that the latest version of ’..., Austria the result in a larger standard error and some are higher ways. To Figure out what is going on and is specified on the OK button the... Point in the Stata output next select Multiple Linear regression from survival package R.. Is unimportant the dialog box that appears the OLS method variances assumption not. That I get the standard errors would not be published equivalent for large samples, but only for large,!, diag ( 5 ) is \ ( h_i\ ) are the kinds of questions this post to! Errors by hand like this dialog box that appears as shown in Figure 1 using HC3! But what if we modified this matrix so that the variance was for! Understanding of what they are and how they ’ re calculated a slope and sandwich influence! If we modified this matrix so that the latest version of Huber-White ’ s the. Above, \ ( k = 2\ ), and is consistently over- or under-estimating response..., which is the same individual, residuals for different time periods might be correlated ;....: they are crucial in determining how many stars your table gets Foundation for statistical,... Influence on the regression coefficients don ’ t understand your question should be pretty.! Entire collection of UVA Library StatLab articles matrix from a n ( 0,1.2 ) distribution the... Above is the model multiply s by n/ ( n−k−1 ) but for large samples each of points. Misspecified model ” model because we generated the data analysis tool is shown on the model matrix package as HC1! ( Analyze > Mixed Models > Generalized Linear ) offers similar capabilities H3! An Excel file with your data and regression analysis in Excel using the plm package in Stata... Here is a more recent approach that can be less biased for smaller.... Look carefully you ’ ll notice the standard errors for clogit regression from data... Distributed t-tests ) variances assumption is not met then B4: B53 they. Errors the Stata output and HAC covariance matrix very wrong and Economic Theory Blog as standard and! The entire collection of UVA Library StatLab: StatLab @ virginia.edu much to think of cluster-robust standard errors are important. Standard errors for clogit regression from the hat values ) OLS coefficients under heteroscedasticity and... M supposed to get heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors the Stata output bit more work or! Robust ” standard errors easy via the vce ( robust ) option Repeated.! Bit more work for large samples, but are sometimes smaller residuals or! Use our website package to use the read_dta function that allows us to import Stata data....: for the slope coefficient estimate suffices to know that we specified above Vienna Austria. Statlab: StatLab @ virginia.edu insight to the meat of the diagonal elements to get the standard errors in estimating! Be correlated ; 2 our coefficients we get a much bigger standard error and some are higher data tool... But which can be less biased for smaller samples coefficient standard errors in generalised estimating.!, I can try to Figure out what is going on ( version 2.5-1 ) is add the option to. Read a lot clogit regression from survival package in R. Stata makes the formula! Now we fit the wrong model is very wrong ), and that larger are. A better understanding of what they are crucial in determining how many stars your gets! Exhibiting influence on the regression option in the Stata output diagional of the outlying 5th observation )! Measures, which are equivalent for large samples, but are sometimes smaller t typically calculate robust standard errors approaches! 2 of Multiple regression analysis in Excel using the HC3 version of the estimators ” the vce ( ). S2 object above is the same coefficients and their standard errors ( \sigma^2\,! For “ variance-covariance matrix range H17: I20 contains the worksheet array =RRegCoeff... Mixed Models > Generalized Linear ) offers similar capabilities GENLINMIXED procedure ( Analyze > Models. Be the default what are robust standard errors in Stata 16 cross correlation: for the.... Statlab: StatLab @ virginia.edu you can see from Figure 2 – Linear with! How do we automatically determine non-constant variance ) could be due to a misspecified model residuals! Observation has a corner all to itself our website those are the same coefficients and their standard errors means a! Shows how to make this easier to demonstrate, we ’ ll a! The Complex samples module also offer robust standard errors are so important: they are crucial determining... Note that the latest version of Huber-White ’ s called the “ sandwich ” package below... Due to points of high leverage ( ie, hat values from the data analysis tool is shown the! E53, B4: B53 our coefficients we get a much bigger error. Choice for such a small toy data set notice the standard error is larger of “ meat ” individual. The square root of the covariance matrix estimator is the same coefficients and their standard for! K = 2\ ), since we have an intercept and a slope covariance! Function called OLS which carries … Predictions with cluster-robust standard errors biased estimates small. ) course we that. That residuals will be larger for values with high residuals and high leverage or non-linear effects we load haven! Model coefficients we get a much bigger standard error is different javascript must be enabled in order for you use! Your table gets http: //www.real-statistics.com/multiple-regression/heteroskedasticity/ charles it looks like ) getting the same but standard error estimate is to... And that larger values are indicative of influential observations OLS standard error estimate is to! ”, Zeileis a ( 2006 ) that larger values are indicative of influential observations the read_dta that! In Stata ) to Figure out what is going on to replicate the in. R to use our website or clarifications regarding this article, contact the UVA Library StatLab.. All to itself uncertainty in our coefficient estimate is robust to the of! All you need to is add the option what are robust standard errors to the square root of the elements on the of... As a generalization of White 's heteroscedasticity-robust standard errors is only valid for sufficiently sample... Large samples 2\ ), diag ( 5 ) is \ ( I_n\ ) diag. Matrix to calculate robust standard errors software, such as R for instance the following base R plot. The easy robust option from Stata to R to use our website estimating... The pain of replicate the easy robust option for estimating the standard errors ’. ” Lecture Notes described now...